Community

The importance of remembrance
How the Poppy Appeal began
Let’s be fair to the old who need care
Can we break the flying habit?
The poisoned chalice
Become a seasonal post sorter
The Tree Council’s National Tree Week:   23 November – 4 December

The importance of remembrance

The act of observing a Two Minute Silence began in 1919 following the Armistice at 11am on the 11th November 1918 at the end of the First World War. 

In 1921, the year the Legion was formed, ‘Armistice Day’ was formally adopted as the national day of Remembrance and the British Legion was charged in its Royal Charter with organising “Festivals of Remembrance, services and parades to perpetuate the memory of sacrifices made during service with Our Armed Forces in war and peace”. 

Since then, the Legion has been responsible for organising national, regional and local ceremonies of Remembrance to reflect the nation’s concern that the human cost of war should not be forgotten.  These include:

The annual Poppy Appeal – the nation’s symbol of Remembrance.

The Two Minute Silence at 11am on 11th November when the nation pauses to honour those who gave their lives for peace and freedom. 

The annual Festival of Remembrance at the Royal Albert Hall to pay tribute to all those who have given their lives for our peace and freedom.

The Parade and Service at the Cenotaph in Whitehall on Remembrance Sunday organised by the MOD in conjunction with the Legion.

This year 11th November falls on a Friday and, as in previous years, millions of people across the nation will stop at 11am for a Two Minute Silence to remember those who fought, and those who are still fighting, for all of us today.

How the Poppy Appeal began

The first donations for artificial poppies were given in Britain on 11th  November 1921, inspired by John McCrae's 1915 poem 'In Flanders' Fields'.

Some of the bloodiest fighting of World War One took place in the Flanders and Picardy regions of Northern France. In the aftermath of the war’s total devastation the only thing which would grow on the land was the poppy. McCrae, a doctor serving there with the Canadian Armed Forces, wrote these verses about what he saw:

In Flanders’ fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place: and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the dead.  Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved, and now we lie
In Flanders’ fields.

Take up our quarrel with the foe;
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high,
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders’ fields.

In Britain, Major George Howson, a young infantry officer, formed the Disabled Society, to help disabled ex-Servicemen and women from World War One. Howson suggested to the Legion that members of the Disabled Society could make poppies and the Poppy Factory was subsequently founded in 1922.

The original poppy was designed so that workers with a disability could easily assemble it and that principle remains today. More than 70% of Poppy Factory employees have a disability or chronic illness.

Let’s be fair to the old who need care

This country’s present system for funding long-term care of the elderly is “full of anomalies”, according to Sir Christopher Kelly, former Permanent Secretary at the Department of Health.  He made this comment when the Joseph Rowntree Foundation published a new discussion paper calling for a national debate on how better to share the cost (of care) between the state and private individuals.

With the number of over-80s set to double in the next 30 years, people of all ages need reassuring that they will be able to get good-quality care when they need it, and will not have to impoverish themselves in the process.

The paper argues that the current system is unsustainable because it provides neither a clear-cut set of entitlements according to how much care people need, nor a well-accepted set of rules about how much they should contribute (linked to ability to pay).

Options suggested for consideration include improving the system that helps pay for residential and nursing care according to an older person’s diagnosed condition. At present, some people get all costs paid by the NHS and others receive very little, even though they might face similar-sized care bills. A particular anomaly is that some with dementia, who need a lot of personal assistance with daily tasks, may receive little or nothing because they do not require nursing.

The authors suggest limiting the extent to which people are required to sell their homes before they can get local authority help with care costs. Raising the threshold from £20,500 to £100,000 would mean that, taking a worst-case scenario, someone selling an average-priced house would not have to spend more than half the proceeds on paying for residential care.

People on low incomes, who currently have to give up almost all their pensions before getting local-authority help, deserve a better deal. “The £18.80 a week they keep in pocket money undermines their dignity as independent adults and could be doubled for a relatively modest public cost,” says the report.

Germany extended its social insurance cover in 1995 to pay for long-term care, and uses a uniform assessment to determine everyone’s entitlement. People can take this entitlement as residential care, home care services or cash. Japan, for example, calculates how much care each person requires and covers this through a state insurance scheme that requires everyone to meet ten per cent of their care costs.

Can we break the flying habit?

For thousands of years men tried to fly and failed. “If God had intended us to fly, he’d have given us wings,” said the cynics. Then suddenly it happened – the aeroplane was invented. Now taking to the sky is possible for millions and aircraft emissions have become a major eco-worry. The gases are released high up in the atmosphere where they do more damage than they would on the ground.

The proliferation of low-cost airlines operating more and more routes only increases the temptation.  According to Friends of the Earth, aviation is now the fastest-growing source of greenhouse gas emissions and UK passenger numbers are expected to rise to 500 million by 2030.

So what do we do about this particular addiction? Just say no? Very difficult. Travel less? Maybe. Until aviation fuel becomes scarce and expensive, or alternative means of powering aircraft become available, there are steps that can be taken to reduce the harm done. The price of an airline ticket could be related to environmental costs by increasing tax on aviation fuel and/or adding VAT to ticket prices, but even then the cost of a ticket may rise little in real terms.

All short-haul flights could be replaced by high-speed rail and boat services. Carbon emissions trading, another option already in limited use, is the system whereby industries that can’t reduce their own carbon-dioxide emissions buy permits from those industries which are able to do so. But campaigners say that this scheme dodges the issue and is ethically flawed. 

From an ethical standpoint, it is worth remembering that tourism is a vital source of income for developing countries and the aircraft industry can now create more fuel-efficient planes. Anita Roddick would like to see money generated by carbon trading and air passenger duty spent on sustainable energy projects and to fund research into renewable energy.

An aircraft emissions charge is being actively discussed within the European Union. The principle that “the polluter pays” is already enshrined in European and UK policy.

On a small scale, there are other things we can do. Instead of using planes like buses, we could take one flight a year, say environmental campaigners. Take fewer trips but stay longer. Future Forests (www.futureforests.com) estimates that a return trip to New York emits 1.23 tonnes of carbon dioxide, which can be cancelled out by buying two trees (they absorb the gas). But wouldn’t that, too, be dodging the issue?

The poisoned chalice

I can’t remember who coined the phrase in relation to the England coach’s job but it was an appropriate one.  Two unimpressive qualifying games and the tabloids’ ‘Sven must go’ campaign is gathering momentum.

Sven is not the first England head coach or manager to come under pressure.  Remember the heading “Swedes 2 Turnips 1” when Graham Taylor’s England lost to Sweden. 

When Glenn Hoddle, arguably the first person in England to lose his job over his beliefs, got into difficulty, it was as if people were sitting in ambush, waiting their opportunity to sack him.   Being a World Cup winner in 1966 did not save Alf Ramsay’s job four years later.  When Kevin Keegan resigned after the pre 2002 defeat by Germany, the pressure was written all over his face.

Now we all have our opinions about whether England should play 4-5-1 or 4-4-2 about the diamond or the Christmas tree and whether or not Michael Owen and Wayne Rooney can play together.  The only difference is that we have the opinions without the responsibility!

It is sadly a fact of life that if you are the England head coach, not only will you be vilified in the tabloids but your private life will be fair game for the media.  It can be a lonely existence. OK there is a pretty good salary but surely a human being is also entitled to be treated with dignity.

In 2002 Scripture Union and Damaris Trust contributed to the debate with their publication “What does the Bible say about Sven on football” (ISBN 1 85999 690 6).

As people who love sport and who love Jesus, what should be our attitude to Sven?  In Romans 13 Paul tells us to respect those in authority.  While Paul is really referring to political powers – not the head coach of the Isthmian Games team, there is an application.  We should respect the authorities in our sports.  Jesus’ command to love our neighbour as ourselves is also relevant.

We should pray for Sven and Andy Robinson, Seb Coe, Duncan Fletcher etc.  Are you praying regularly for those in authority in your sport?  Drop them a note of appreciation and support.

By Stuart Weir of Christians in Sport
www.christiansinsport.org.uk

Become a seasonal post sorter

Father Christmas may have his team of elves to deal with all the presents up there in Lapland, but who helps the Royal Mail sort the mountain of Christmas post down here?  The answer is: a multitude of temporary staff, and recruiting starts each November.

It’s not just students who can make a little extra Christmas cash – anyone up to the age of 65 can do it.  You can even specify the times when you would prefer to work – with a round-the-clock choice.  

Each year people of all ages: students, housewives, senior citizens, earn extra cash for Christmas.  A short induction course is provided on the first day, including advice on how to lift heavy sacks of Christmas mail!  (Apparently more time is lost in the postal service through bad backs than anything else.)

The Tree Council’s National Tree Week:   23 November – 4 December

National Tree Week is the Tree Council’s festival to mark the start of the tree planting season, and a nationwide celebration of trees and woods. Across the country there will be lots of opportunities to plant trees, or to take part in events, walks, talks, songs, story-telling and tree dressing. 

Is there something missing from your patch - not enough trees or even no trees at all?  To mark the 30th anniversary of National Tree Week, The Tree Council is inviting everyone to help make trees matter by planting and celebrating trees in National Tree Week.

Go to Next Page

Go to Previous Page

Go to Index Page

Go to Home Page